3/18/2021 0 Comments Conners Rating Scale Printable
The rating scales each available in long and short formare completed by teachers, parents, and adolescents.All items contained within the various CRS-R forms utilize a 4-point scale; these include 0 (not true at all), 1 (just a little true), 2 (pretty much true), and 3 (very much true).Alternatively, computer scoring and interpretive reports are available through the publisher.
![]() A total of 1,000 Black adolescents were included in the sample, whichaccording to the manualwarranted the creation of normative data specifically for Black youth. According to Conners, if individuals were assessed simultaneously, 95 of the scores would be within 1.96 SEM of their theoretical true scores. Similar observations were made with respect to the standard error of prediction. Clinicians could have expected an individuals obtained scores to be within 1.96 SEM of predicted scores. Correlations ranged from.47 for the Conners Teacher Rating ScalesRevised Long Version (CTRS-R:L) Cognitive Problems and DSM-IV Hyperactive-Impulsive scales to.89 for the Emotional Problems subscale of the Conners-Wells Adolescent Self-Report Scale Long Form (CASS:L). Internal consistency reliabilities for the CRS-R Parent and Teacher Forms were within the moderate (r.73) to high (r.96) range. Likewise, the Adolescent Self-Report Form evidenced moderate (r.75) to high (r.92) internal consistency reliability coefficients. Convergent and discriminant validity provided additional support for construct validity. Convergent validity was demonstrated using correlations of long and short forms, which ranged from.95 to.99 on various scales. Discriminant validity was supported by evidence that the CRS-R discriminates between clinical and nonclinical groups. The reliability and validity estimates are generally acceptable. However, the standardization sample was not representative of the U.S. Black parents were underrepresented; White parents were overrepresented; and the adolescent scales overrepresented Black youth. Furthermore, several reliability and validity estimates were derived from samples of 100 individuals or fewer; some included fewer than 50 observations. As stated above, the manual reported that the CRS-R significantly delineates clinical from nonclinical groups. It is noteworthy that approximately 38 of the youth within the study sample had an ADHD diagnosis, whereas base rate estimates for the prevalence of ADHD within the general population have been 2 and 7.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |